I do enjoy a good Man vs Nature film; ‘Jaws’ is certainly a classic, ‘Razorback’ as one of my all time favorite films and for anyone who hasn’t seen it, ‘The Grey’ is a phenomenal film.
‘Yellow Fangs’ though I would say is an odd, interesting little number from icon Sonny Chiba, who directed but didn’t star in this film. The Sankebetsu Brown Bear Incident loosely inspires the film; where in 1915 a brown bear awoke from hibernation and killed several villagers over the course of several days before being killed. Read the article about the attacks on Wikipedia; it’s an interesting read and I’d certainly like to get my hands on one of the few books written about the incident. Surprisingly; this is the only film based on it.
In this dramatization, Yuki has returned home to her village after leaving employment with a village elder because of unhappiness. Disowned by her disgraced father she spends time with an old friend Eiji, while at his house; she receives word of a bear attack at her home. Her family killed, Yuki vows vengeance and when Eiji and the other bear hunters in the village refuse to let her go with them; she sets out on her own to kill the creature; dubbed Red Spots.
The story itself is rather basic and certainly falls into the numerous ‘giant creature on a rampage’ formula post-‘Jaws’ cinema. There were two things that surprised me the most about ‘Fangs’ is that the film is told almost entirely in flashback and that the bear itself is more of a backdrop for a character drama about sex separation in early 1900s Japan.
After the opening kill (as these movies always do) at a village, we meet Eiji and the other hunters a year into their search. When they go after a bear they think is Red Spots, Yuki surprises all of them and slays the bear before running off; cue flashback for the next hour.
While I’m not bashing flashbacks as they can serve a narrative purpose in revealing character and plot points; I found that having nearly 80% of the film be a flashback a mild distraction as there was no tension with the hunters or Yuki; I knew they were going to make it up to a certain point and I kept thinking when the film would return to the present. It can be done effectively don’t get me wrong; but I’m just old fashioned I guess as I know some people who might call this style ‘avant-garde’; personally I prefer a more traditional A-B-C structure. While I do enjoy the bouncing style of ‘Pulp Fiction’; there is a sense of momentum and buildup that here in ‘Fangs’ is left out. I didn’t care for the flash-back style of storytelling.
But what I don’t think is a drawback and in fact came, as at first a disappointing yet pleasant surprise was the film was more of a character drama than a straight horror film. Netflix’s synopsis even calls the film ‘a drama’. Don’t get me wrong there are bear attacks, blood, and some ‘chases’; but the film at it’s core is a look at the sex class system in Japan during that time and breaking the boundaries set upon you by your culture of the film.
Yuki herself is fighting not only the bear but also Eiji as he tries to protect her by sending her back home and back to what he (and the other hunters see) as women’s duties of tending to the home. It’s the same theme we’ve seen in countless costume dramas throughout the ages and here it’s executed competently and short of the injections of the bear; the focus is more on Yuki and Eiji’s relationship.
For this reason I’m sure that most fans will turn off ‘Yellow Fangs’ as the formula of having ‘kill, filler, kill, filler, kill, filler’ etc is more or less done away with here. Long pauses without attacks is a nice change and I would even say that writer Shigeko Satô might have been looking back to ‘Jaws’ where once again the focus was on the characters.
It’s something that sets ‘Fangs’ apart from the numerous post-‘Jaws’ animal movies that focus only on the animal attacks and not the characters and story; or how numerous zombie films post-Romero focus on the zombies and less on the characters and story.
For those of you who haven’t IMDBed this film before you read the review or during your read; a big surprise for you is that the film is from 1990. The big reason that this is a surprise is that it feels very 1970s; it feels very ‘old fashioned’ (as those who consider anything older than 2000 ancient) in compared to films of that period.
Chiba made a very classic feeling movie; if the year was never listed I would have pegged it to be in the 1970s plain and simple. The look of the film, the pacing and event the acting is old school. This is not a slick film, the slight grain and slightly washed out look of the movie brings back memories of another time.
And that’s not a bad thing I would say; I didn’t mind the feel or the look of the piece; in a way it felt like a nice breath of fresh air after seeing so many recent ‘animal attack’ films that look exactly a like.
But with that comes the Japanese acting; which for much of the 20th Century was still very theatrical in how the actors worked on screen and to most Western audiences; it could look a little silly. Emotions at times are very over exaggerated in times of high drama and once again, it’s very theatrical. If you’ve watched a lot of more recent Japanese films where the acting has become far more understated and ‘natural’; without being exposed to older films, the acting might be a turnoff.
For most American audiences; the only recognizable face in the cast would be Hiroyuki Sanda. Sanda first appeared to the US in ‘The Last Samurai’ and has gone on to appear in ‘Sunshine’, ‘Speed Racer’, and the upcoming ’47 Ronin’. Once again, taking the acting in context of it’s time and country; it’s fairly good in my view, it’s not Kurosawa class acting; but neither is it bad.
What is bad though; is the bear. Obviously the film didn’t have a huge budget and most of it seemed to go for attaining the look of the early 1900s and shooting out in practical locations. And it seems for that reason the bear suffers massively. In my old ‘Rawhead Rex’ review I hit the film hard on for showing the creature in full in the opening five minutes and here in ‘Fangs’ you see the bear in full within the first five minutes.
When standing on it’s hind legs, the bear is obviously a guy in a suit; the head having basic open and close movements, though it appears wildly out of proportion to the rest of the body. While at times the suit is covered in quick cuts and fast camera; it’s shown in the open far too much to be anything scary. In other shots where the bear is running on all fours; a different suit seems to be used and is a little more effective there as the cuts are a bit faster.
A real bear is used in some wide shots and obviously those are quite effective as it’s a real bear. And unlike some modern films, which use stock footage, it’s clear they had a real bear there on set.
Fans of nature run amok will be disappointed in this, the attacks have some blood but aren’t as viscous as some other films. The bear isn’t scary and to be honest, I didn’t mind too much as I was enjoying those sequences on a cheesy level. I would backup my initial statement that the main focus of the story is a character drama and the bear is basically an after thought; something to move the story along.
The only part I really didn’t care for was the score; which was made of guitar riffs, synths, and drums and was very pop and rock in feel. It felt very out of place; it wasn’t dark enough try and push whatever drama or horror was happening. It was far too, modern I would say. It was over the top and made no qualms about it. The score, could be rescored I feel.
Overall, ‘Yellow Fangs’ is a strange little film; fans of nature attack films will be disappointed in that the animal action is relegated to the backburner for much of the film and the focus is a drama. And for such a modern film is feels very old fashion; but that might still get a curious onlooker or two.
I really can’t give this film a rating; all I can really say is that if you’re curious, check it out.

HorrorMovies.ca